How accurate is radioactive dating definition of elucidating

By dating rocks of known ages which give highly inflated ages, geologists have shown this method can’t give reliable absolute ages.

Many geologists claim that radiometric “clocks” show rocks to be millions of years old.

We can assume that the Precambrian rocks already existed when life began, and so the ages of the Precambrian rocks are not necessarily related to the question of how long life has existed on earth.

The Cambrian period is conventionally assumed to have begun about 550 million years ago.

After all, textbooks, media, and museums glibly present ages of millions of years as fact.

Therefore, my main concern is with rocks of the Cambrian periods and later.I believe that there is a great need for this information to be made known, so I am making this article available in the hopes that it will enlighten others who are considering these questions.Even the creationist accounts that I have read do not adequately treat these issues.If these dates are correct, this calls the Biblical account of a recent creation of life into question.After study and discussion of this question, I now believe that the claimed accuracy of radiometric dating methods is a result of a great misunderstanding of the data, and that the various methods hardly ever agree with each other, and often do not agree with the assumed ages of the rocks in which they are found.

Search for how accurate is radioactive dating:

how accurate is radioactive dating-52

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “how accurate is radioactive dating”

  1. (Yes, it’s okay to love what you do.) There should always be a designated time for the two of you to come back and share what’s been going on in each others lives. For example: find a day that the two of you have off and focus on spending that time with each other.