Radiological dating setting up a dating website

Between 19 several teams made a number of radiometric measurements, and the results clustered around three ages-1.8 MY, 2.4 MY, and 2.6 MY.

Leakey declared that the skull was 2.9 MY, and said that it “fits no previous models of human beginnings.” It was named KNM-ER-1470 (for Kenya National Museum, East Rudolf, #1470).” The only answer to that question is that “good” samples give dates that are in accord with evolutionary presuppositions.“Bad” samples are the ones that give dates not in conformity with evolutions classic illustration of circular reasoning.5 Grand Canyon Dating Creationists have criticized many aspects of dating rocks by radioactivity, but have offered little real proof that the method is flawed.The “correct” answer is chosen on the basis of stratigraphic sequences, that is, what kinds of fossils are buried nearby.Of course, the fossil dates depend on the assumption of evolution.

Search for radiological dating:

radiological dating-56radiological dating-86radiological dating-16

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “radiological dating”